A Reckoning · 2026

Six years after A Life on Our Planet

David Attenborough laid out a witness statement and a plan. Renewable energy. Protected oceans. Lighter diets. Space for nature to return. The technology was real. The deadlines were tight. Here is where each pillar actually stands.

Energy· Oceans· Diet· Rewilding
↓ Scroll

None of his proposals were science fiction. The models work where they have been tried. The technologies exist.

But doable and on track are different questions. On most of the four pillars, we are behind schedule.

— Pillar 01
Switch the world to renewable energy
Outpacing forecasts

This is the proposal where the news is genuinely good. Renewables passed coal in the global electricity mix for the first time in 2025 — about 34% of generation against coal's 33%. Solar PV alone delivered the largest one-year increase from any source on record outside of post-crisis rebounds. Battery storage capacity grew roughly 40% in a single year.

The catch: we sit at about 5.15 TW of renewable capacity against the COP28 pledge to hit 11 TW by 2030, and IRENA does not think we make it without significant acceleration. AI data center demand is propping up natural gas — and in some places coal — muddying the trajectory.

34%
Renewables share of global electricity, 2025 — first time above coal
5.15TW
Installed capacity vs. 11 TW COP28 pledge for 2030
~47% of 2030 target4 years left
— Pillar 02
Protect a third of the ocean
Behind schedule

As of April 2026 the UN reported the ocean finally hit 10% protected — six years late on the previous target. The current goal is 30% by 2030, and only about 3.3% is actually effectively protected. The rest still allows activities like bottom trawling, or has not been implemented on the water at all.

2025 was the biggest single-year jump in nearly a decade, and the High Seas Treaty entered into force in January 2026. Both real wins. But the math from 10% to 30% in four years is brutal.

10%
Ocean protected on paper, April 2026
3.3%
Ocean effectively protected — fully enforced MPAs
33% of 30x30 target4 years left
— Pillar 03
Eat lower on the food chain
Barely moving

The hardest of the three pillars, and the one moving slowest. The technology exists, the modeling is real — but the OECD-FAO outlook through 2034 has poultry consumption continuing to climb, expected to reach 45% of all meat protein. Alternative meat sales actually fell 2.3% in 2024 as inflation hit and retailers pulled back on plant-based offerings.

The flexitarian middle is real — about 46% globally per ADM's 2025 survey — but absolute meat consumption is still rising, not falling.

−2.3%
Alternative meat sales, 2024
46%
Flexitarian share globally, 2025 — but absolute meat consumption still climbs
Trend running the wrong direction
— Pillar 04
Rewild — and let the population stabilize
Slow but durable

The mechanisms here are well-validated. Costa Rica reversed its deforestation. The demographic transition through girls' education and healthcare works wherever it is funded. These are the slowest-moving levers in the plan, but also the most durable.

The proposal was never a single intervention — it was the long compounding work of giving land back, expanding the protected estate, and letting the global population peak earlier and lower than it otherwise would.

17%
Land area under some form of protection — short of the 30x30 target
2080s
Projected global population peak — earlier than 2020 forecasts
57% of land 30x30 target4 years left
The honest read

Partial credit. And partial credit still matters.

He was not proposing anything impossible. The energy pillar is outrunning what most people thought possible in 2020. The ocean pillar is moving but will not hit the deadline at current pace. The diet pillar is barely moving at all. Rewilding is slow and steady where it is funded.

None of this means the planet is doomed. It means we are getting partial credit on a test where partial credit still matters a lot.

The proposals are technical questions with social answers. We know how to do every one of these things. The bottleneck is collective will — and that is exactly where the variability is.

Read today's awe walk →
60 seconds, one creature, one place